The Red Herring SEO sales strategy is commonly used among some large and small SEO firms. In this instance the SEO rep (see company in graphic), scanned the site for any error they could find to alert the site owner that they have very serious SEO problems due to the negligence of their current SEO firm (us). Well, they didn't find any Meta tag errors, density issues, or linking problems, but they did find 12 W3C (CSS) compliance problems in the site content!
Alarmed, the client contacted us immediately to discuss this problem that must be addressed before he loses his existing high ranking SERPs. We explained that W3C compliance issues are definitely something that we look at and fix on an ongoing basis, however, it was not at all likely that SERPs were being negatively effected by this issue. To illustrate our point further, we went ahead and did a compliance scan of (I'll let them be anonymous but if you look hard you can see them) - the company using the Red Herring sales approach and here's what we found:

We found 13 W3C compliance errors. Now, that doesn't mean that this company is inept or doesn't have a handle on SEO. Many, very well managed sites (even many SEO sites) will have W3C compliance errors arise from time to time and it requires some ongoing maintenance. When we showed our client that the company that had him up on arms about the 12 W3C errors that existed on his web site actually had more of the same errors on their own site, well... he got the picture.
Unfortunately, this tactic is common and it is far less than honest - in this case hypocritical. Many SEO sales persons are trained to use basic scanning bots to nit pick the compliance of a site in an attempt to discredit other SEO professionals rather than focus on the positive elements of their service. When we speak with a prospective client for example, we immediately acknowledge our observation that a site has or has not had a professional SEO work on it. In cases where we acknowledge that it has been worked on by a professional or someone with SEO knowledge (usually made obvious by titles), we focus on the reason why the client contacted us in the first place by discussing their goals rather than looking for ways to fool them into believing that the work that was done is somehow inferior.
This is fair warning to the users of the Red Herring approach. From this point forward, we will expose companies who use it when we encounter them. Next time, I'll put the company name in this blog. It's dishonest and unprofessional to use the Red Herring strategy and may be indicative of the integrity of their service.
Unfortunately, this tactic is common and it is far less than honest - in this case hypocritical. Many SEO sales persons are trained to use basic scanning bots to nit pick the compliance of a site in an attempt to discredit other SEO professionals rather than focus on the positive elements of their service. When we speak with a prospective client for example, we immediately acknowledge our observation that a site has or has not had a professional SEO work on it. In cases where we acknowledge that it has been worked on by a professional or someone with SEO knowledge (usually made obvious by titles), we focus on the reason why the client contacted us in the first place by discussing their goals rather than looking for ways to fool them into believing that the work that was done is somehow inferior.
This is fair warning to the users of the Red Herring approach. From this point forward, we will expose companies who use it when we encounter them. Next time, I'll put the company name in this blog. It's dishonest and unprofessional to use the Red Herring strategy and may be indicative of the integrity of their service.